Did Eve Have Sexual Relations With Satan?
There exists a fascinating theory about Eve and her offspring referred to as the “bloodline” or “serpent seed” theory. The theory, in a nutshell, goes something like this: Eve was tempted by Satan to eat of the tree of knowledge. The forbidden knowledge was in regard to human sexuality. When Eve ate of the tree her “eyes were opened” and she shared her new knowledge of sex with Adam. After acquiring this knowledge Adam and Eve became sexually active and began to produce children.
The theory states that Satan appeared to Eve as an angel of light. Perhaps he was masquerading as Christ himself. Now that Eve had a carnal knowledge of sex she was easily seduced into having sexual relations with Satan. At this point proponents of this theory would inject the phenomenal modern discovery of “twinning”. A woman can become pregnant with twins fathered by two separate men. In a very rare occurrence a woman can have sexual relations with a male and then three or four days later have a sexual experience with another male. The ‘twins’ within her womb are fathered by two separate men.
This phenomenon, applied to Even would enable her to give birth to twins. Cain and Abel could have different fathers. Eve, seduced by the “angel of light”, conceived Cain with Satan and then she had relations with Adam and conceived Abel. Those descendents of Cain have had to shoulder much of what has ever been wrong in our world.
Hitler embraced a theology that included the idea that the world had to be cleansed of the “serpent seed”. There would be no Golden Age for mankind if these Satanic descendants were not eliminated. It seems Hitler arbitrarily assigned Jews and blacks as “serpent seed” and developed a system to eliminate masses of Jewish people in an attempt to ‘purify’ the Aryan race. Could this idea once again prime the pump of hatred in the final days by associating Christians or those who reject the mark of the beast with the “serpent seed” that must be eliminated?
The Bible clearly teaches that a person’s relationship with God is determined by the spiritual state of a person, not their genealogy. Genesis 4:1 reveals that Cain was a result of a union between Adam and Eve and Satan had no part of it. “And Adam knew (had sexual relations with) Eve his wife; and she conceived (this was a result of their relations), and bare (gave birth to) Cain.” 1 John 3:12 identifies Cain as being “of that wicked one (Satan)”. Cain belonged to the ‘wicked one’, not because of his bloodline but because of his disobedience. His problem was spiritual, not genetic.
“And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.” (Genesis 3:6) Satan wasn’t tempting her with sex. The serpent wasn’t offering himself as a temptation. Eve would fall into sin in the same manner Lucifer fell. She chose to reject the authority of God and attempted to be a god unto herself. It is still the common temptation of our modern age. Rather than submit to God men attempt to set themselves up to be their own god. Eve’s temptation was for mental superiority, not sexual pleasure.
The “serpent Seed” theory is a weak attempt to divert our attention from the real truth. If we could somehow connect our sin to genetics we might eliminate our personal accountability for sin. There is a strong movement in our culture today to blame sin on genetics. Jeremiah said that “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” (17:9) Paul wrote to the Romans, “…all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” (3:23) Each and every man, regardless of his bloodline, needs to repent of his sin and receive the saving grace of God.
At best, the “serpent Seed” theory has no scriptural proof, it is simply one of the wild imaginations of men’s hearts. At worst, it is a twisting of the truth found in God’s word.
We must be very careful when treading these waters because God warns us in Revelation 22:18, “If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book.”
by
MR C
people teach the tree in the garden in ezekiel 31 was not a fruit but a linage, they take genes 6 and also the 6chapter of the book of enoch. everything was destroyed in the flood so i think this is a trick of the enemy to get us off the apostles example acts6:4. lets stay with whats relevant and not controversal
Greg Wilson
We know by reading that cain and abel were twins looking in the hebrew it say again which means continue.So there twins,now if you go back and look at adams geneology,guess who you dont find(cain)so if he isnt there,which he isnt, then henceforth he isnt adams.Satans or the thousands of other people living i dont know ,but not adams. Problem solved
Kevin Probst
Whatever might be taught at your church or school, take everything with a grain of salt. Test the spirits to see if they be true. Our standard is the Word of God. If its not in the word of God or if it doesn’t mesh with the word of God its not worth spending a lot of time on it or even giving it serious consideration.
Anonymous
can you provide some guidance?
Anonymous
This is actually being taught at the moment in my church. Am I am absolutely distraught about the whole thing.
Anonymous
There might not be scriptural proof, but the word of God says to rightly divide the word, not just read and not research because there are too many books of the Bible left out. Futhermore, There was no apples in the garden of eden let alone in that area back then, so explain the tree of knowledge, if it wasn’t flesh and blood.
Dustin Basting
Most people who refute this claim leave out Gen. 3:15 which clearly implies that the serpents offspring will have hatred towards Eve’s seed. I will be clear with you every time I have read through Gen 2-5 I have not been satisfied with what it’s saying.