Can Christians Lose Their Salvation?

One of the most difficult questions to answer in apologetics and Christian theology is, “Can a person lose his salvation?” For some it’s an issue of semantics. The word ‘lose’ indicates having misplaced something. It is not unusual for me to misplace my keys or the remote control but it is utterly ridiculous to entertain the idea that one might lose (misplace) their salvation. Can you imagine going into work one day and hearing a colleague say, “I’ve misplace my salvation, will you help me find it.” In that sense, of course, salvation cannot be ‘lost’.

We tend to emphasize salvation, or being born again, as a one time, crisis event. There is a sort of “cheap grace” idea that all that is necessary to assure eternity with God is to mentally assent to the idea that Christ is the Messiah and he did die on the cross and was resurrected for the salvation of mankind. If you ‘believe’ this you are in. Those who promote this shallow idea seem to be ignorant of the fact that how one behaves is determined by what one believes. Cheap grace is mental assent without any radical change in behavior. Genuine belief would change behavior. Those who follow this deception love to say, “Christ saved me for all the sins I committed, am committing and will commit. Therefore, it doesn’t really matter what I do, I’m saved.” The Apostle Paul condemned such heresy with strong words, “Shall we continue to sin that grace may abound? God forbid!” (Romans 6:1-2)

Most Christians would agree that God has given man a gift of free will. Our salvation is determined by what God wills (sovereignty) and what man chooses (free will). God’s plan is simple to understand: He wants to save sinners, make them into saints and then populate a new world. It is a sort of reverse creation. The first time he made the world and populated it with people. This time he is making the people to populate a new world. God doesn’t make a saint instantaneously, it is a process. A person can step on the road to salvation in an instant but then he is granted many opportunities to progress along the way.

Many look at salvation as an arbitrary experience God forces upon certain pre-destined souls. Others believe men cooperate with God for salvation by choosing to answer his call. If we are free to enter into salvation why are we not free to leave? This isn’t like Hotel California:

Last thing I remember, I was
Running for the door
I had to find the passage back
To the place I was before
’relax,’ said the night man,
We are programmed to receive.
You can check out any time you like,
But you can never leave!

It seems contrary to the nature of God to slam and lock the door once we enter. It may be possible for man to retain the ability to leave but it doesn’t seem probable. Why would anyone choose to leave heaven to live in hell? Why would anyone choose death rather than life, misery rather than serenity?

There are three stages of salvation: Justification is when the soul is set free from the penalty of sin. Sanctification is when the soul is set free from the power of sin and glorification is when the soul is set free from the possibility of sin. Justification is available to any who will confess their sins and abandon a sinful lifestyle. “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.” (1 John 1:9) We enter the door of sanctification the moment we willingly consecrate our lives to Christ and we submit ourselves to a long, and sometimes tedious, process of becoming more and more like Jesus. “For this is the will of God, even your sanctification.” (John 17:17) Justification and sanctification are pre-requisites for the final stage of salvation called glorification when our salvation is finally complete. This stage comes after the death of the body when the soul is transported beyond the reach of temptation and sin for all of eternity. “Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears, we shall be like him…” (1 John 1:3)

Salvation is not complete until we have been glorified. When one boldly declares he cannot lose his salvation must we not ask, “How can you declare you cannot lose something you have not yet attained?” I am not yet ready to declare “Once saved, always saved” but when I cross the bar or when Christ appears to whisk away his own, in that day I will shout it to from the mountain at the top of my lungs, “I am once saved, always saved.”

I believe that “he who has started a good work in you will carry it on to completion” (Philippians 1:6) But God, through an act of love, seems to have tempered his own sovereignty by gifting man with free will. Christians are certainly eternally secure but this security is conditional. It could be disrupted by the sovereignty of God or the free will God has given man. Can a man lose his salvation? I don’t think so “for I am convinced that nothing can ever separate us from God’s love.” (Romans 8:38) Paul goes on to list all the things that are incapable of separating us from God’s love. But, Paul does not include ourselves in that list. Can a man choose to become an apostate? The Bible seems to indicate that a man can choose to walk away from God. There are at least 80 passages of scripture in the New Testament that teach that the process of salvation can be interrupted, delayed or stopped altogether.

Jude 21 says, “Keep yourselves in God’s love” and verse 24 says, “He is able to keep you”. Doesn’t this indicate a conditional relationship? He will keep us if we will determine to be kept.

Jesus declared himself to be the true vine. The dead (unfruitful) branches are cut away and destroyed. The fruitful branches are pruned so they will produce even more fruit. “Remain in me and I will remain in you.” (John 15:4)

Christ warns against the prevalent teaching of ‘cheap grace’. “If we deliberately keep on sinning after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins. But a fearful expectation of judgment.” (Hebrews 10:26-17) There is a terrifying judgment for those who received knowledge of the way but broke away and chose to live in continuous, deliberate sin.

Peter says, “It would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than to have known it and then to turn their backs on the sacred command that was passed on to them” (1 Peter 2:20) He is saying that they are worse off who have entered the way and then departed from it. This is contradictory for those who argue that we might continue to live a sinful lifestyle and still be rewarded eternal life. If they received eternal life how are they worse off?

In conclusion, I would question the idea that we cannot walk away from God because it seems to make God inconsistent. Either he has gifted us with free will or he has not. But I would argue strongly that it is very unlikely that a man would choose to walk away from God if he were truly, genuinely saved. Maybe a more accurate statement would be not so much, “Once Saved Always Saved” but “If Saved Always Saved.”

4 Comments

  1. barney

    Shalom Kevin,

    PLEASE consider the following very carefully.

    Going forward – you advance the argument that once an individual Believer is initially saved they will ALWAYS be saved…hence, Eternally Secure.

    Thus, this provokes the preponderance of the germane theological notion and question as defined below.

    Are the ‘potentially’ FUTURE UNCONFESSED/UNFORGIVEN Sins of 1 Jn. 1:9 and Matt 6:15, 18:35, et. al., 100% (absolutely) FORGIVEN as part of the INITIAL Justification (New Birth) package, of which you suggest to be PERPETUAL/Eternal Justification as a consequence of ALL Past/Present/FUTURE Sins being FORGIVEN by God, and therefore that FORGIVENESS automatically IMPUTED to the Believer to include 100% FORGIVENESS for absolute ALL Future Sins as well?

    PLEASE take careful note of Jesus’ and John’s CONDITIONAL “IF”(greek ‘ean’ 1437) stated in each of these below cited Passages.

    1 John 1:9 (KJV)
    9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

    Matthew 6:15 (KJV)
    15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

    Matthew 18:35 (KJV)
    35 So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.

    Likewise, PLEASE take careful note that these above cited potentially UNCONFESSED and UNFORGIVEN Sins of the said Believer, subsequent to their Initial Justification are NOT NEW Sins at all, but the SAME IDENTICAL SINS that you suggest are allegedly already FORGIVEN as part of the INITIAL Eternal Justification package (Past/Present/Future) at the New Birth (FUTURE Sins) – and they are just now coming into reality and being committed by the Believer as Sin.

    Therefore, does God then indeed FORGIVE the SAME IDENTICAL “Future” Sin “TWICE” or “PARTIALLY” FORGIVE a Sin – once at INITIAL Justification and once AGAIN at Post Justification when the said Sin is actually and literally committed?

    Is not SIN just that SIN and it does not matter what heading we choose to categorize or define it under – i.e. Positional, Judicial, Fellowship, Experiential, etc.

    Do you suggest then that a stubborn rebellious subsequent NEW BIRTH Believer who willfully REFUSES to CONFESS his/her Sin(s) before God, will actually be FORGIVEN an CLEANSED of that particular Sin in accordance with the above cited Passages…especially 1Jn. 1:9?

    Where then is the 100% ABSOLUTE FORGIVENESS of ALL “Future” Sins at INITIAL Justification – which Eternal Security/OSAS theologically mandates? PLEASE do the math…

    Returning then to my earlier cited theme of Sin ‘classification’ I submit the following to the attention of your Biblical wisdom for your intuitive clarification.

    If we suggest a DUAL Position for a given Sin respective of 1 Jn. 1:9 and Matt 6:15, 18:35, et. al., then this would be implying that EACE INDIVIDUAL Sin has ‘TWO’ aspects – Positional and Experiential/Fellowship, etc., and that ONE singular Sin would have then TWO ‘required’ FORGIVENESSES before it could be deemed as COMPLETELY FORGIVEN.

    For example, if I declare that I am going to build ONE SINGULAR House with ‘TWO’ distinctive rooms (aspects/parts/A&B). Then, upon the actual completion of ONLY ONE of the TWO required rooms, can I legitimately declare the ONE SINGULAR House ‘absolutely’ COMPLETE/FINISHED?

    Going forward, the potential UNFORGIVEN Sins of 1 Jn. 1:9 are the very SAME IDENTICAL ‘Future’ Sins that is suggested by the theology of Eternal Justification to have been absolutely FORGIVEN as part of the INITIAL Justification package, which as stated INCLUED ALL (absolute) FUTURE Sins.

    Nonetheless, it does not matter under what heading or category we place these potentially UNFORGIVEN Sins – they are nonetheless still potentially UNFORGIVEN Sins…Sin is just that SIN.

    Therefore, to classify a singular Sin as having TWO ‘aspects/parts/features’ of FORGIVENESS would be as defined below:

    1a. – the POSITIONAL FORGIVENESS aspect…accomplished at INITIAL Justification having a PAST/PRESENT/FUTURE determinate (PERMANENT).

    2b. – the EXPERIENTIAL/Fellowship FORGIVENESS aspect…accomplished at the Believers CONFESSION ‘POST’ Initial Justification.

    However, by default this suggested ‘aspect’ classification of the SAME said Sin, then exists in TWO parts A and B and unavoidably mandated as ‘mutually exclusive’ – cannot occur at the same time…One aspect/part (A) occurs at INITIAL Justification and the other aspect/part (B) at POST Justification.

    Nonetheless, BOTH ‘aspects/parts/features’ of the said singular Sin must be cumulatively FORGIVEN before the Sin itself can be considered/qualified as COMPLETELY FORGIVEN?

    It is IMPOSSIBE then for a SIN with two mutually exclusive (cannot occur at the same time) aspects/parts/A&B to then be COMPLETELY FORGIVEN at Initial Justification – BOTH aspects would have to occur together (SIMULTANIOUSLY), but by default ONLY aspect/part A is FORGIVEN, because as stated the aspects are mutually exclusive, the POST Initial Justification aspect part B of this SAME IDENTICAL FUTURE Sin has never come into fruition, and has literally never been CONFESSED by the Believer who has committed it, and subsequently FORGIVEN as Scripturally required by 1Jn. 1:9, for ALL SUBSEQUENT New Birth Sins.

    There is NO WAY possible of making the math work.

    This is what I originally asked, If we declare that 100% of ALL FUTURE Sins have ALREADY been FORGIVEN at INITIAL Justification…Why are the ‘post’ Justification POTENTIAL UNFORGIVEN Sins of 1 Jn. 1:9 NOT included as part of the INITIAL Justification package that is suggested to FORGIVE ALL FUTURE Sins as well?

    barney

    Reply

    • Kevin Probst

      Barney,
      Thank you so much for your post. I’m not sure I have comprehended the totality of your point. I am a simple-minded, amateur theologian and quite frankly, I had trouble following your points. I think what you’ve said is all logically connected and I think I am in agreement with you but could you possibly simplify your explanation?

      Reply

    • tonyh

      Barney,

      You make some interesting observations but I would like to express some difference with you view. Like Kevin I am not an academic but I study scriptures for living, since the just shall live by faith.

      1. 1Jn 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

      Does this verse then mean IF we don’t confess our sins He is faithful and just not to forgive and NOT TO CLEANS US FROM ANY UNRIGHTEOUSNESS? Is this consistent with the justifier of the ungodly? Doesn’t this suggest that then if you not be cleansed of UNRIGHTEOUSNESS you remain unrighteous? If so then are we saying the so called RIGHTEOUS are only righteous until the next confession? How are they the righteous then?

      There is clearly some inconsistency with this verse. Of course in this chapter the Apostle does not tell us who he is writing to but it seems obvious his audience has no fellowship with God, and it is an audience which does not believe they sin, because of some doctrine they hold.

      Now look at chapter 2.

      1Jn 2:1-2 MY little children, THESE things write I UNTO YOU, THAT YE SIN NOT. And IF any man SIN, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: (2) And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.

      He does identify his relationship with those to whom he writes.
      He assures then that you are likely to sin, but if they do sin, they should know they have an advocate on this side of the father. To do what?

      Unlike his audience in Ch 1 and in keeping with Paul and other NEW TESTAMENT writers, he doesn’t advocate for confession of sin.

      He assures THIS audience they have an advocate with the Father.

      On the side, how many sins must one confess to be cleansed of unrighteousness? Lets say you commit 10 sins in a day, and you are a very intelligent so you remember or recognize 9 and you do repent or confess, of those. If you are cleansed of the 9, does the 1 you did not remember to confess leave some (or is it make you unrighteous) unrighteousness until confessed? Or maybe you are really Godly and you only, may be, sin say once a day (According to Romans 14:23 anything that is not of faith is sin, how many things that are not of faith do we do a day and so how many sins of commission, now add of omission!), and you think you so perfect and don’t realise you sinned, and so you don’t confess, are you unrighteous?

      Like I said I only study the bible for faith, which comes by hearing. I don’t have answers but my faith tells me to hang on to chapter 2 but preach chapter 1 to sinners!

      2. Your Matt 6:15, 18:35, et. al

      You quote thus

      Matthew 6:15 (KJV)
      15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

      Matthew 18:35 (KJV)
      35 So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.

      But I quote thus

      Ephesians 4:32
      And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you.

      Colossians 3:13
      Bear with each other and forgive whatever grievances you may have against one another. Forgive as the Lord forgave you.

      Your “Matt 6:15, 18:35, et. al” is an Old Testament mindset. You are quoting verses that are radically different in mindset from the 2 I have quoted, the marked difference is the cross! Heb 9:16-17 For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. (17) For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

      Jesus spoke both old and new covenant truth! We filter the truths by the main clause of the new covenant:

      Heb 8:6-13 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises. (7) For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. (8) For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: (9) Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. (10) For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: (11) And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest. (12) For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more. (13) In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

      By the way, do you notice the tenses used in the verses I quote above? “God in Christ also has forgiven you” and “the Lord forgave you, so you must forgive others.”

      Does this mean the Holy Spirit omitted to remember that we will commit other sins in future? Or He did not in fact forgot, but actually is implying its only the past sins that we have been forgiven of? Waal! I chose to believe He is all knowing and He knows we have been forgiven past, present and the future.

      In fact it is this word “forgive” that creates problems. I don’t know what academics will say, but personally I understand that God is not even looking at sins of those that are in Christ Jesus, but he is looking at the righteous of the body of Christ and considers it MY RIGHTEOUSNESS.

      2Co 5:19-21 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation….(21) For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

      So I choose to totally discount all you arguments!

      Reply

      • Gary Linton

        Tony – I will attempt to answer you briefly. If you take 1 John 1:9 in context of 1 John 1:7 it deals with us walking in the light of His exposure. In other words, not trying to ever keep anything from or never concealing anything from God. As we walk in this way the blood of Jesus cleanses and keeps on (constantly) cleansing us from all sin once we are in Christ (2 Corinthians 5:21). I would read my article on the Differences Between the Old and New Covenants. I hope this helps.

        Reply

Leave a Reply